<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dividend Analysis - Paychex Inc (NASDAQ:PAYX)</title>
	<link>http://www.dividendsmatter.com/dividend-analysis-paychex-inc-nasdaqpayx/2007/10/17/</link>
	<description>Everyone else gets paid.  Why shouldn't you?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.dividendsmatter.com/dividend-analysis-paychex-inc-nasdaqpayx/2007/10/17/#comment-280</link>
		<author>Aaron</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dividendsmatter.com/dividend-analysis-paychex-inc-nasdaqpayx/2007/10/17/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>PAYX looks like a pretty good play for the portfolio. The dividend growth is quite impressive there and the valuation seems to be pretty good compared to its peers as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PAYX looks like a pretty good play for the portfolio. The dividend growth is quite impressive there and the valuation seems to be pretty good compared to its peers as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: average_joe</title>
		<link>http://www.dividendsmatter.com/dividend-analysis-paychex-inc-nasdaqpayx/2007/10/17/#comment-263</link>
		<author>average_joe</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dividendsmatter.com/dividend-analysis-paychex-inc-nasdaqpayx/2007/10/17/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>I believe that the S&#038;P 500 PE is usually in the 15 to 17 range.  But I would have to confirm that.

So yes, this is a fairly high PE at 28.69.  It is far below the historical PE values.  But it does not seem an unreasonable level for a future EPS growth rate of 15%.

Typically, when I look for a future PE, I will use the more conservative of the historical PE or the current PE.  But, I will also use a rule of thumb of 2 times the future EPS growth rate.  I'll then use whichever number is lower.

As you'll see, when I sometimes analyze a utility with a future EPS growth rate of 4%.  I will typically assign a future PE of 8 - even if the lowest historical PE is at 15.  Why?  Because I think that PE is just too high for such low growth prospects.  And if I am right about the low EPS growth rate, that PE will contract.

AJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the S&#038;P 500 PE is usually in the 15 to 17 range.  But I would have to confirm that.</p>
<p>So yes, this is a fairly high PE at 28.69.  It is far below the historical PE values.  But it does not seem an unreasonable level for a future EPS growth rate of 15%.</p>
<p>Typically, when I look for a future PE, I will use the more conservative of the historical PE or the current PE.  But, I will also use a rule of thumb of 2 times the future EPS growth rate.  I&#8217;ll then use whichever number is lower.</p>
<p>As you&#8217;ll see, when I sometimes analyze a utility with a future EPS growth rate of 4%.  I will typically assign a future PE of 8 - even if the lowest historical PE is at 15.  Why?  Because I think that PE is just too high for such low growth prospects.  And if I am right about the low EPS growth rate, that PE will contract.</p>
<p>AJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dividend Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.dividendsmatter.com/dividend-analysis-paychex-inc-nasdaqpayx/2007/10/17/#comment-262</link>
		<author>The Dividend Guy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dividendsmatter.com/dividend-analysis-paychex-inc-nasdaqpayx/2007/10/17/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Hey Joe - Thanks for the analysis.  Do you think that you P/E ratio is a bit high?  I know historically it falls in place, but I might be a bit more conservative with the ratio. It is higher than the average P/E for the S&#38;P.

Just wondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe - Thanks for the analysis.  Do you think that you P/E ratio is a bit high?  I know historically it falls in place, but I might be a bit more conservative with the ratio. It is higher than the average P/E for the S&amp;P.</p>
<p>Just wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
